Drug Trafficking: An Alternative Perspective

At a college meeting, I listened to a Mexican national vehemently condemn her country’s president for attempting to stop the drug traffic into the United States. Her argument was that El Presidente caused  life in her city to be disrupted by police raids on drug houses. In retribution cartel soldiers killed Mexicans citizens. Her question was: why couldn’t life return to the way it was before the Mexican President started his harsh intrusions? The city populace shouldn’t be inconvenienced by US citizens’ decisions to use drugs.

I said nothing, perhaps I was too stunned; maybe I wanted to be polite to a student; perhaps, I was a coward. A United States proverb is “Silence is consent;” Yet, I was far from consenting to her opinion that drug traffic should be able to flow freely from Mexico into the United States.

This Mexican student gave her opinion about 10 years ago. I no longer live in a border city or near the US-Mexico border. However, I can’t forget what she said. She gave me a perspective that I never considered. I wondered how many individuals in both Mexico and the United States share her views? Do politicians who advocate open borders between United States and Mexico realize that open-borders facilitate the flow of illegal drugs into the United States? Do they care?

News commentators averred that 90% of drugs enter the United States come over the Mexico-US border. The value of drugs that enter the United States from Mexico is as high as 46 billion dollars annually. In 2018 estimated drug-related US deaths was nearly 72,000, up nearly seven percent from 2017. In the United States, drug overdose death are higher than traffic accident deaths, gun-related deaths, or suicide.

The choice to consume drugs is an individual decision. No one makes users consume them. If users stopped using illegal drugs, no illegal drug market would exist. Drug trafficking would dry up or be substantially reduced. Perhaps, the student was correct—why should her city’s way of life be disturbed because Americans want to use drugs? On the other hand, I thought her words were self-serving. She wanted safe streets. So did I.

We are responsible for our own behavior. Self-responsibility includes using or not using illegal drugs. Because life included poverty doesn’t mean we have to take illegal drugs. Some individuals reared in poverty and squalor haven’t succumb to drug use. Instead, they have made major contributions to the well-being of the United States. I think of Dr. Ben Carson’s life.

Despite self-responsibility, if illegal drugs weren’t readily available, ravages of drug use to include deaths, would be lower. Ten years ago El Paso was a crime-filled city. In the State of the Union speech, President Trump lauded El Paso as one of the safest cities in the Country. The difference was construction of a wall between El Paso and Cuidad Juarez which reduced the flow of illegal drugs. In 2019 we have an opportunity to reduce the flow of drug traffic into the United States by building a wall with our southern neighbor. Another U.S. proverb is “tall fences make good neighbors.”

Dr. Carolyn A. Roth

Dr. Carolyn A. Roth is a spiritual woman who believes that the Bible is the inspired Word of God. She is the author of eight books, most of which are Christian nonfiction. Her passion is delving deeper into the Bible to glean wisdom nuggets from relatively obscure passages. Carolyn is a retired university professor who lives in Roanoke, Virginia with her husband, Bruce. Read more at www.CarolynRothMinistry.com.

Related Articles

Back to top button

Please disable ad blocker.

We work hard to write our articles and provide you with the content you enjoy. The ads on the site allow us to continue our work while feeding our families. If you'd please whitelist our site in your ad blocker or remove your ad blocker altogether, we'd greatly appreciate it. Thank you!