Hillary Will Abort 1,000 Years of Energy Independence

screen-shot-2016-10-16-at-8-11-18-amAs the 2016 presidential campaign is coming to a close there is one issue this writer would like to have seen stressed more than it has been. That is energy and the issue comes strongly to my mind as first I live in the Southwestern part of Virginia and second, I married a coal miner’s daughter. In the latter case my father in law, a miner for thirty three years before becoming a carpenter, acquainted me with information that later led me to make a study at a nearby university. It was titled “The Politics of Energy.”

Donald Trump has made a case for the need to save our coal mines and the jobs of thousands of miners. Hillary Clinton has opined that the day of coal use is behind us and that we just need to retrain miners for other occupations. I agree with Mr. Trump and during the second debate he touched on a solution that I wish he had dwelt on. That was the turning of coal into synthetic fuel. Yes it can be done and has been done.

The phrase used for Trump’s idea is gasification and it has been used with success in the past. It was first experimented with and used by the German Empire in World War One when there was a shortage of oil. Hitler’s Germany again resorted to this in World War Two. In the United States we began experimenting with this idea in the early 1970’s.

The information gained from my study revealed how a possible solution to our energy problems was cut off for political reasons.

In the late sixties the potential of a severe energy crises and our dependence on oil from the Middle East had the administration of President Richard Nixon seeking for solutions. It was brought to the attention of the Nixon people that we had the greatest energy resource in the world. The four state area of Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky and Ohio has been described as the Persian Gulf of coal. We had at the time 300 years worth of clean coal and 700 years worth of dirty coal, enough to supply the whole nation. If you consider that in 300 years we should be able to find a way of cleaning dirty coal that would mean 1,000 years of fuel to take care of our nation without outside dependence. This is not science fiction, it is reality.

Copying the German model it was decided that gasification could be the answer. Ten plants were opened and it looked like we were on the way. Instead the plants were closed down in less than a decade.

Even the best of ideas can be held hostage to political consideration. In the case of the Nixon Administration Watergate sucked the air out of a lot of projects. Oil companies that owned 80% of the mines were less than enthusiastic about the competition. There was also an immediate cost factor that was felt needed attention despite the long run savings that would be made for centuries. We also were involved in making trade deals with Saudi Arabia and other Middle East nations. By the end of the Carter Administration all ten plants were closed.

Recently it was announced in the Roanoke Times that Virginia Tech and State University will be undertaking three studies in Southwestern Virginia about turning converting coal into a synthetic fuel.

However, under Hillary Clinton there is no chance that this technology for using coal will go forward. She is determined to close our mines. Well, maybe not completely, just closed for use by the United States. Every day, from where I am writing this, I can see trains headed for the Norfolk ship yards. These are freight cars loaded with clean coal that is being shipped to Japan, China and elsewhere. That includes nations willing to try gasification.

Our 1,000 years of energy independence is being traded away.

Dr. Fred Eichelman

Dr. Fred Eichelman is a retired teacher and a director for Point North Outreach, a Christian media organization. He recently had a book published, Faith, Family, Film-A Teacher's Trek. Fred is a former local Republican Committee chairman and has attended hundreds of conventions from political to science fiction. He sees the two as compatible. Fred also tells us he values very much a title we gave him since he could not be a PolitiChick. PolitiDude.

Related Articles

Back to top button

Please disable ad blocker.

We work hard to write our articles and provide you with the content you enjoy. The ads on the site allow us to continue our work while feeding our families. If you'd please whitelist our site in your ad blocker or remove your ad blocker altogether, we'd greatly appreciate it. Thank you!