Voter Redistribution — How Obama’s HUD Wins 2016…and Beyond!
Last week revealed that Obama’s Department of Housing and Urban Development is creating “the largest consolidation of personal data in US history”–a vast left-wing data base. But I think Obama’s data mining goes more than skin deep.
HUD’s data collection of Americans’ health, home loans, credit cards, work places, neighborhood and even children’s school records will be used to “prove” racial bias justifying government intervention, perpetually fueling government and private lawsuits even in the absence of any complaints of discrimination.
New York Post author Paul Sperry writes that the purpose of HUD’s new Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing mega database is “to racially balance the nation, ZIP code by ZIP code . . . . and publish ‘geospatial data’ pinpointing racial imbalances. . . . Federally funded cities deemed overly segregated will be pressured to change their zoning laws to allow construction of more subsidized housing in affluent areas in the suburbs, and relocate inner-city minorities to those predominantly white areas. HUD’s maps, which use dots to show the racial distribution or density in residential areas, will be used to select affordable-housing sites.” (emphasis added).
HUD. Select subsidized affordable housing sites in suburbs. Translation: Relocation.
Reading between the lines, gathering racial statistics can cover a much more nefarious political goal: the legal justification to use federal dollars to move liberal voters into conservative neighborhoods — to redistribute enough Democrat voters to permanently alter the political landscape.
Enter Julian Castro, Secretary of HUD, “a proven leader, a champion for safe, affordable housing and strong, sustainable neighborhoods” according to none other than President Barack Obama. While serving as Mayor of San Antonio, Castro “became known as a national leader in urban development.” As HUD Secretary, Castro is a loyal Democrat operative, key to the legal redistribution of Democrat votes. Attractive, young, married with two children, this bilingual Hispanic Democrat with a B.A. from Stanford and a law degree from Harvard is the perfect choice to administer the Furthering Fair Housing program…and perhaps to run for president once Hop-along Hillary sings ‘Happy Trails’ after her last rodeo.
Democrats know that, given a level playing field, they are in trouble heading into the 2016 presidential election. Hillary is a personal and professional campaign disaster, hardly the gender-ific version of Obama’s racial rock stardom. Growing concerns over ISIS, Muslim extremism at home, Hillary’s Benghazi bungles, her foreign donor data base and private server SNAFUs fuel a national sentiment towards national security, a tried and true Republican strong suit.
To save his legacy of Liberalism, Obama must act now to secure the national elections. Amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants cannot secure future Democrat demographics in time for 2016. In less than 18 months, Democrat voters, voters with a stake in maintaining and growing Democrat government programs, must be strategically planted where they can make a difference politically.
Bush v. Gore and the battle of the hanging chads showed it only takes a handful of votes per precinct to change victory margins across the nation. In 2012, four million Republican voters stood on their principles protesting Romney’s mild-mannered candidacy by staying home, effectively making the difference in favor of Obama. Moving a few million Democrat voters out of predominantly blue inner cities and into swing districts would make the difference in 2016. No need to worry about voter ID laws or amnesty either. Redistributed votes are legitimate in every way, presuming voter registration coordinates with the housing application. And all paid for by taxpaying voters.
Obama’s centralized HUD database is a master stroke. By creating the vast HUD database, Obama is creating a sophisticated, statistical means of legally justifying the redistribution of voters effectively using racial politics to cow opposition all while generously rewarding civil rights lawyers and media race mongers.
Unless conservatives in Congress quickly find the collective wit and political will to defund the vast left-wing data base, federal, state and local elections across the nation will be determined for decades by HUD as legal forces align to maintain a political demographic advantage through bureaucratic population management.