Obama’s Boot On the Throat of America
Whether you agree with the politics of the day or disagree, we can all agree we live in interesting times. Never before in the history of the United States have we seen events unfold that would lead one to believe we have a government, or more to the point, a regime that is openly flaunting its agenda bypassing Congress and the Constitution and using every bit of force and intimidation to accomplish its outcome. It is no accident that our government schools flaunt their social engineering agenda (e.g., outcome-based education and liberal and unconstitutional Common Core).
We have freedom of speech, thought and religion equally, but we are learning that the Progressive mentality, the “religion of peace” and socialized agendas are more equal than others. They are tolerant in our society as long as it fits within their politically corrupt view “through the looking glass.” We are living in a fantasy world, a fairy tale if you wish, that has been perpetrated on countries and governments throughout the ages and is now on our shores even stronger than before.
We are treated to a Utopian concept that was presented by Sir Thomas Moore, in his book, Utopia (1516 A.D.) and put into effect by the American Puritans that is quickly disappearing from our country.
Why?
It can be deduced down to Karl Marx’s statement, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” Another name for this is socialism (synonyms: Commie, Comrade, Red, Communist; antonym: Capitalist). Socialism can only work under a totalitarian government (China, Cuba, North Korea, etc.).
Perhaps you noticed on one of the Trayvon Martin’s protesters signs, “Capitalism is racist.” Rahm Immanuel (“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste”) thinks like a Communist, too.
In the Koran, there are numerous verses that “define the concept of the Zakat (obligatory charity).” Many of us would like to think that being charitable to those less fortunate than ourselves is a universal concept, but under Islam, it is not always doing what is right because it is right, but doing right because it is demanded.
Unlike the world of the 1950s, we are pressured with socialist agendas and Islamic Sharia tolerance. We now have a president whose father and stepfather were Muslims, which under Sharia law, technically makes him a Muslim. To be fair, he claims to be a Christian; however, here he praises the Koran, pokes fun at the Bible and has no problem flawlessly speaking an Arabic phrase.
For the first time in the history of the United States and in the shadow of September 11, 2001, we have elected a Kenyan-American with Muslim ties and a Muslim name to the highest office of the United States, the most powerful position in the world. What a wonderful opportunity bring together, through this one man, the uniqueness of calming racial tensions and divisions and to allow a salve to be administered to heal the tensions between the Judeo-Christian American and its recently influx of millions of Muslims. He has always had a supportive national press and he had a Congress that was of his party. (See my article Obama’s Fifth Column is the Fourth Estate.) Sadly, instead of rising to the occasion, his Islamic-socialist agenda took center stage.
The Muslim Brotherhood, the original patriarch of terrorist organizations, now has a red carpet rolled out to welcome them at the White House.
It appears that the New Black Panthers are above the law. The radical New Black Panther’s 2008 and 2012 voter intimidation agenda is more akin to the wizards of the Ku Klux Klan and is preferred by this regime over the rule of law. Many of us witnessed the chilling pictures of a nightstick wielding, pseudo military figure and his partner from the New Black Panthers at a polling place in Philadelphia.
After the 2012 election, charges were brought against these two threatening figures, only to have the case dismissed by Attorney General Eric Holder and the resignation of an officer of the court due to an unwarranted manipulation of the government in support of lawless actions.
Judge Andrew Napolitano writes an article for Fox News titled, “Above the law—Obama’s radical rejection of the rule of law has fatal consequences.”
Forty-one states introduced some form of voting restrictions (e.g., voter ID, proof of citizenship) in 2012. Eighteen of those proposed bills passed. When legitimate individual states, in the face of mounting voter fraud by illegals and others, chose to have a simple photo ID issued by the government, the Progressives made a fuss over what they saw as voter intimidation. Never mind the fact that these states, acting in good faith, were willing to take on the expense of providing to the poor of this nation, regardless if they were Hispanic, Black or Caucasians, free voter ID cards. We were told by this regime that voter ID cards were analogous to Jim Crow Laws, all the while disregarding the fact that, in the spirit of “hope and change,” a Black man was voted to the highest office of the land.
On the heels of the Zimmerman/Martin trial, Eric Holder is crying foul once again. I think the Attorney General is hung up on a Jim Crow political mindset.
Digressing to Benghazi, Breibart.com’s author, David Bossie, wrote on July 13:
“Thursday July 11th marked the ten month anniversary of the terrorist attack that killed four Americans in Benghazi, Libya. I have not forgotten. Nor have I forgotten that’s it’s been 65 days since the last public congressional hearing on Benghazi (Victoria Nuland’s confirmation hearing last week notwithstanding).
“I’ve also not forgotten that it’s been 81 days since the five House Committee chairmen who share jurisdiction on the Benghazi attack released their 43-page so-called interim progress report on the investigation. It’s worth noting that the email sent by the House Republican Conference that circulated the report stated: ‘The Committees intend to fulfill their responsibility to the American people to continue to explore these issues in the weeks and months ahead.’ The American people are still waiting for answers.”
Yes! We are still waiting on answers and congressional action/discipline!
To recap the evens of September 11, 2012, a Muslim mob surrounded the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt exploded, and according to Hillary Clinton and General Petreaus, the riot was caused by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, a Coptic Christian film maker. However, we know that on September 10, al-Qaeda head honcho, Ayman al-Zawahrin, publicly called on Libyans to seek revenge for the killing of a Libyan al-Qaeda leader. (The film depicts Muhammad as a womanizer, homosexual and a child molester.)
On the evening of September 11, 700 miles away in Benghazi, Libya, a different and more clandestine attack was perpetrated against the United States consulate in Libya. There were eight hours of bloody fighting resulting in the deaths of the American ambassador, Chris Stevens and two Navy Seals Ty Woods and Glen Doherty who were defending the U.S. annex in Benghazi, along with some 30 other traumatized or wounded federal workers, Americans who seem to have been secretly hidden away with many presumably having their names changed.
Diane Sori writes for the Tea Party Tribune. She states, “… former CIA Director David H. Petreaus and then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton both knowing beyond a shadow of a doubt that NO video was involved, they both bold-faced lied to Congress when first questioned…”
Diane continues:
“They all willfully, deliberately, and with malice LIED to Ambassador Stevens’ family and to ‘We the People’. And while we all know that some claim that Stevens was the middle-man in Obama’s gun and weapons running operation to the Syrian rebels, or that he was actually kidnapped to trade for the Blind Sheik and mistakenly killed, I believe that what I will tell you about this picture coupled with Obama’s cover-up and LIES, gives credence to my belief (one that I’ve had since day one) that Ambassador Stevens found out Obama was running guns and weapons under the table to the al-Qaeda supported Syrian rebels, and was silenced before he could expose what Obama was doing.”
Even with Congressional hearings, we still don’t know what happened, but what is more important is that we now have one of the few, if not the only person, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, in the United Sates jailed for political reasons to appease Islam, to make it seem like he was the one responsible for Benghazi and for being counter to this regime.
So what was Nakoula Basseley Nakoula’s agenda when he produced the film? Was it to embarrass the United States or was it to go against the Islamic sensitivities of the president? Or was there a deeper mission to expose the struggle between Islam and Christians that reaches back to the seventh century, before the North American continent was even known about.
Earlier this month, Nigerian Islamists burned a school and killed 29 Christian children and one schoolteacher. The children who tried to escape from the building were shot and killed on the spot. Those who were too afraid to escape were left to be burned alive.
These are the betrayals of what is really happening in our world today, which you will never read in this regime’s Fourth Estate. But these are the vivid scenes that have been brought home to Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, an Egyptian Christian who has personally been affected by Islamic culture.
I will deviate for a moment and observe that not all Muslims want to kill Christians and Jews, and we must equally admit that not all Christians try to love their neighbors as themselves, but the sad reality is, in the Middle East especially, Jihad against Christians and Jews is a way of life.
Where is Mr. Nakoula, the filmmaker who rightly expressed his First Amendment rights and because of that, he was used by the current regime as the fall guy for Benghazi? He is now a political prisoner. It is unbelievable that someone would be a political prisoner in the United States of America, but he vowsto complete his film when he is released on September 26 after spending one year in a Southern California federal prison.
For those of you who are unaware, Islam means submission and if you degrade Islam or insult the Prophet Muhammad, it becomes the duty of every Muslim who comes across your path to kill you. Please do not take my word for it. Research on the Internet and purchase an acceptable translation of the Koran (English spelling), or look at some of the Hadiths, the second most holy books in Islam.
Knowing this, Mr. Nakoula did the same thing that many authors, including Samuel Clemens, have done—produced his work under the pen name—Sam Bacile; in this case for fear of his life.
Why is he in jail for exercising his First Amendment rights? It seems that Mr. Bacile was previously convicted of bank fraud and was not allowed to use an alias. (I would argue there is a difference between a pen name and an alias, which is used for fraudulent reasons (e.g., to hide from police, creditors, file false forms for jobs, credit, etc.) However, the Progressives say he was jailed because he broke probation, but that is just a smoke screen. We know he is a political prisoner.
Thus, the pictures of the filmmaker Nakoula being led away by California law enforcement officers was the sacrificial lamb used to continue to sell Obama’s agenda while placating the Muslim world once again.
We see more evidence of the continuing appeasements by Barack Hussein Obama when he addressed the United Nations in 2012. Referring to Mr. Nakoula’s film he said, “The future must not belong to the people who insult the prophet Muhammad.”
Once again, Barack Hussein Obama is performing the act of submission, bowing to Islamic tolerance.
We are now feeling the pressure of Obama’s boot.
Consider the ongoing Gestapo/strong-arming tactics of the IRS, the DOJ, the FBI, the allowed Nazi-esque actions of the New Black Panthers, the socializing of one-sixth of our country’s GDP through ObamaCare which Nancy Pelosi told Congress they had to pass it to find out what was in it—and the raiding of Gibson Guitars by feds dressed in swat gear, with machine guns. They disconnected the video surveillance, lined employees up at gunpoint and shut the company down for two months for allegedly importing contraband wood for its guitar necks. Gibson had donated to Republican Party as opposed to not raiding Martin Guitars who donated to the Democrat Party and used the very same wood, the raiding of a private food club in Venice, California over the issue of raw milk, where the FDA, FBI and LAPD took everything, and so many more incidences too numerous to mention.
Obama has put his boot on the throat of the Constitution, which is very Nazi-esque. This might only sound like an exaggerated threat by Robert Gibbs to those under 40, but to people who are closer to WWII, we know what the boot means. They were the Nazi Stormtroopers who wore the boots. If you were unfortunate enough to cross them, you would find yourself lying in a pool of blood with a boot on your throat. This led us to believe that this unguarded threat by then Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, on behalf of the administration in May of 2010, that they were going to “keep a boot to the throat of BP to make sure the company stops oil from a sunken rig from pouring into the Gulf of Mexico as soon as possible,” was a dramatic foreshadowing of things to come—and we were correct.
Why would he use that term out of history that is reminiscent of the Gestapo? What are on the minds of these people? Oh, that’s right—Communism.
Ten years ago, this country understood socialism was wrong, that it was just Communism dressed in a different outfit.
America is at a crossroads—we are living in perilous times.
“If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land” (2 Chronicles 7:14).
