Gay Agenda or Communist Agenda? (Red Pill or Blue Pill?)

red_pill_blue_pill-copyIs anyone seeing the bigger picture of what is going to happen to our churches if pastors are forced to marry homosexuals, when they obviously would be going against God’s Word in doing so? To answer this question, you must first understand that litigious-happy lawyers are now running this country.  So what will happen if any pastor, in an effort to stand with God’s Word, refuses to marry two people who are gay or lesbian?

The answer:  ACLU.

It doesn’t take much to understand that there will be lawsuit upon lawsuit, initiated by the ACLU, trying to force churches out of operation if they do not conform to their wishes regarding the gay agenda.  This is not only going to infringe on the definition of marriage according to the Bible, but it will also open the door to the legalization of everything else under the sun.

The Communists in this country are working triple time to make Christianity irrelevant, just as Obama has been making Congress and the American people irrelevant (due to the number of executive orders). In regards to gay marriage, no one seems to be talking about the fact that there is an even more prevalent problem with keeping the churches alive if gay marriage becomes a federal mandate.  Instead, the main voices we’re hearing are the thuggish not-so-veiled threats screaming “Make marriage legal for everyone or we will put you out of business!”

Picketing ChurchesTell me…if this is indeed not an agenda to shut down the churches of this country, then why aren’t gay people demanding the right to walk into American mosques and ask an Imam to marry them? 

None of this so-called “hatred toward gay people” is coming from Christians.  Instead, the people instigating the hostility and hatred are the people who despise and want to end the institution of traditional, Bible-based marriage—something that has been practiced for thousands of years.

Bottom line:  You cannot change a church into what it is not — or it cannot continue to be a church.

Unfortunately, there is an even bigger agenda involved than just the gays demanding “marriage rights”; it is a Communist agenda where making the churches obsolete is the goal, as they are in many European countries now.

Atlas Shrugged author Ayn Rand once said, The government was set to protect man from criminals and the Constitution was written to protect man from the government.”

Although it is known that Rand was an atheist, she well understood the ramifications of what would occur to our constitutional rights, once the Communists started chipping away at them.

In 2013, the “criminals”, mostly Communists, are within our government and they are annihilating the Constitution, because the Constitution is a Communist’s worst enemy. They know that if the American people can no longer look to God during hard times, that they will be forced to look to the government instead.

What Communists/atheists have never understood is that Christianity, much like Judaism, is not as much a religion as it is a culture — a way of life.  The people of Israel asked God for a set of laws and, with Moses as their leader, God gave them the Ten Commandments to follow. What but for God’s set of laws would we be basing our own laws on, if the Ten Commandments did not exist to begin with?

We are all sinners and God loves us all equally, as we are made in His image. However, there is a line to be drawn when it comes to the government forcing gay marriage upon churches and synagogues.  One of the main reasons the church exists is to set the standard for a majority of Americans, who are heterosexual Judeo-Christians.  Marriage is an institution that has only been mentioned and existed in the Bible and the subject of marriage was never raised in the Constitution. This alone renders it a states’ rights issue, being that if it had been mentioned in the Constitution, only then would it have been considered a federal one. In the Bible, it was solely intended to unite one man with one woman. That being said, the only accomplishment achieved by calling the union of two people who live a homosexual lifestyle “marriage” (rather than a “civil union”), is to trivialize Christianity.

And if anyone denies the precedence that atheism and moral relativism have taken over our society to the point that everyone should be included in everything, why then, did they have to sue to take any reference of God out of the schools (with Obama’s Common Core Curriculum), sued to take the plaques containing the Ten Commandments out of the courtrooms (due to liberal activist judges) and yet are now trying to force churches to stand for gay marriage or lose in the game of “we won”?

So we’ve come to a point where I now ask: Will you take the Red Pill or the Blue Pill?

Written by Lisa Winne-Clark

Ann-Marie Murrell

Ann-Marie Murrell is one of the creators of PolitiChicks and co-owns the site with Morgan Brittany. Ann-Marie is co-author of two bestselling books, “What Women (Really) Want” and "PolitiChicks: A Clarion Call to Political Activism". She has appeared on dozens of television shows including Fox & Friends, CNN, Hannity, the Dr. Phil Show, Huckabee, Lou Dobbs, C-SPAN, One America News, Stuart Varney & Company, Newsmax, MSNBC, and more. In addition to PolitiChicks, Ann-Marie has written for multiple other news sites. You can find Ann-Marie Murrell on Facebook and Twitter: @PolitichickAM E-mail: [email protected]

Related Articles

Back to top button

Please disable ad blocker.

We work hard to write our articles and provide you with the content you enjoy. The ads on the site allow us to continue our work while feeding our families. If you'd please whitelist our site in your ad blocker or remove your ad blocker altogether, we'd greatly appreciate it. Thank you!