Truth in Advertising

During my time in the advertising industry I was adamant that “Truth in Advertising” was my highest priority when working for clients.  The thought of misrepresenting something and using the always-famous “bait and switch” approach, especially when I was working with car dealerships, was something I desperately did not want to be associated with in any way.

Truth.  That was my ultimate goal.

I knew then as I still do now that advertising is sales.  Truth is bent to the closest edge of the mountain to eventually convince someone they need what you are offering.

Politics is sales.

It is the most basic, gut wrenching, manipulative type of sales.  Even though it is cutthroat, it doesn’t excuse anyone from leaving the basic tenet of “Truth”.

We were taught as small children (and teach our own children, hopefully) that truth is the basis of everything.  You can’t have a friendship or any type of relationship without truth.

A sign hangs in my children’s school that defines ‘Honesty’ as: “The quality of being truthful, sincere, upright, and fair; free from deceit or fraud.  Always speak the truth.”

The sign also has a quote from William Shakespeare: “I know thou’rt full of love and honesty, and weigh’st thy words before thoug giv’st them breath.”  Today’s translation: I know you are full of love and honesty and you think about words before you say them.

Truth grows trust.

Truth reflects character.  So does the lack of truth.

So why is it that during the highly charged, emotion driven period of an election we throw truth and the character is represents, right out the window with political advertising?

We have gone so far away from seriousness of truth and its essential place in elections that printing companies are building ad campaigns around our acceptance of lies.  BBDO Advertising did a wonderful job on the following ad for FedEx titled “Candidates”.  It pretty much says it all:

What is even more disturbing is our own sitting President excuses the behavior of abandoning truth.

Recently in a “60 Minutes” interview on CBS, President Obama said, “Do we see sometimes us going overboard in our campaign, are there mistakes that are made, areas where there is no doubt that somebody could dispute how we are presenting things? You know, that happens in politics,” Obama said.

Everyone knows it does, he is correct, but should we continue to approve of it?  Should the office of the President of the United State condone it?

Today with not only the actual campaigns producing commercials but with the insurgence of Political Action Committees (PACs) how can anyone monitor and manage “truth in advertising”?  Even though the advertising produced by the campaigns has to have the candidate state in their own voice that they approve of the ad, it doesn’t testify to truthfulness.

Hearing a candidates voice at the end of a commercial caused me to question recently, did you really approve this ad or have you given your creative team a blanket approval for all ads? If candidates approve their ads knowing they are misleading and not factual, how can we trust their character once they are in office?

This sounds incredibly Polly Anna, I know.  But as citizens and people who base our own business practices and social relationships on trust and truth, should we allow candidates to blatantly lie?  Really, how many people fact check things?

Advertising is advertising in my opinion.  One type of ‘product’ doesn’t get a pass from truth over another ‘product’.

In all my years of working in advertising agencies and then as an in-house advertising person, if I had presented any product I was representing in a bad light or in an untrue manner I would have been fired.

When I was writing copy for a local fitness center, if I had said a woman would lose 20 pounds in her first month of working out with us and it didn’t happen, I would have been fired and the company would have been sued.  Why do you think all of the weight loss advertisements tell us, “Results not typical”?

Yet we don’t hold politicians to task on the things they say about themselves, or hold them accountable for backing up claims against their opponents.

Maybe along with their verbal approval on ads, we should include in writing on the screen “results of candidate and reliability of claims against opponents are not guaranteed” just to cover themselves.

Certainly resurgence in “Truth in (Political) Advertising” won’t change this election cycle.  But what if we stood up and raised the bar of our expectations and started speaking out against the ugly advertising and unsubstantiated claims made throughout election advertisements?  It would be refreshing to have presidential character and campaigns that didn’t endorse “overboard” advertisements and claims, which could be disputed.

Character does count.



Tina Drake

Arizona PolitiChick Tina Drake has been teaching and mentoring Junior High and High School students, in churches where she has been active, since her time as a college student, over twenty-five years ago. Tina believes politics and religion can, and should, be discussed together. She says she is a lifelong follower of Christ and believer in the true significance of God's power in each and everyone's life and she believes in the absolute need for God and Christ to be honored and included in the decisions made for our country. Tina continues to mentor students in this age group, along with her husband, multiple times each week. She believes that encouraging people, especially students, to see the need for a relationship with God and Jesus Christ in their everyday life, is an absolute need in her life. Tina volunteers weekly in her children's school, allowing her to witness how today's students are learning and developing in their social, educational, political and spiritual beliefs. Witnessing how students experience life, during the timeframe of Junior High through College, is immensely important to Tina. She believes this age group needs to be mentored, so they will have the tools with which to navigate today's societal pressures to live life without God, rather than with Him. Tina has also been a teacher to women in churches, teaching small groups, as well as speaking to large groups on a variety of spiritual topics. In addition to Spiritual Formation, Tina has been actively following and discussing the many facets of politics. Tina is a graduate of the University of Arizona, having earned a degree in Communication and a minor in Political Science. After college, she worked in the field of Advertising and Marketing, specializing in Media Buying and Planning, as well as directing entire Marketing and Sales departments. She has been a writer for since 2012 and says she enjoys the opportunity to encourage Americans to live out their faith in Jesus Christ, while they stand firm on the principles set forth by our forefathers in their political beliefs.

Related Articles

Back to top button

Please disable ad blocker.

We work hard to write our articles and provide you with the content you enjoy. The ads on the site allow us to continue our work while feeding our families. If you'd please whitelist our site in your ad blocker or remove your ad blocker altogether, we'd greatly appreciate it. Thank you!