The past few years it seems like more and more rules are being broken—no, make that demolished—by the progressives in America. Barack Obama didn’t need Congressional approval to go to war with Libya, but can you imagine if a Republican president did the same thing? President Bush had approval and he was still admonished as a ‘war monger’. Barack has gotten off scot-free no matter how many Islamic countries he aids and abets or how many drone attacks he commissions.
I think it’s because the rules they have for us are much different than the rules they follow themselves. They actually seem to despise rules—unless they want to inflict their rules on us. Here are some examples.
Many states are trying to require everyone shows photo ID to vote in 2012. Sounds logical, right? For something as important as a United States Presidential election you’d think everyone would want it to be on the up-and-up—especially after all the scandals from ACORN in 2008.
Right? Well, no.
The infamous Department of Justice has already blocked South Carolina for simply trying to enforce the laws they already have and they’re trying to block other states as well. Their reasoning, according to the NAACP, is that the laws are “repressive to minorities and poor people.”
Star Parker was recently on Fox News and she laid it all out there perfectly.
“It’s in the tradition of the Democrat Party to participate in voter fraud,” Parker said, “and so when you ask for ID you cannot manipulate an election.”
“This particular issue, voter ID…is about illegal immigration,” she continued. “This is not an issue for the NAACP nor should they try to make it an issue of race. This is about having illegals participate because we know we have a lot of illegals that are now moving into these other states and it is putting the legitimacy of their votes at risk.”
Of course, my state of California has leap-frogged over this entire problem by not having voters show any form of ID at all at precincts. Basically anyone—legal or not– can walk into any random precinct on election day, glance at the list of names and addresses, say ‘Hey, that’s me!’ and voila, there’s your voting ballot in the hands of someone who is NOT you.
DEMOCRAT RULE #2: It’s OK to forge signatures on electoral petitions (NOTE: THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO ANY MEMBER OF THE GOP)
Speaking of voter fraud, Barack Obama’s entire presidency has been stuffed full of the stuff—from forged signatures in his electoral petitions to the questionable birth certificate, missing college records and of course the ACORN debacle.
“This fraud was obvious, far-reaching and appeared to be systemic,” 22-year-old Ryan Nees told Fox News, referring to evidence he uncovered while researching electoral petitions from the 2008 Democratic Party primary in Indiana.
According to a report in Fox News, college student Nees’ investigated the petitions that put then-senatorsBarack Obama and Hillary Clinton on the ballot. They alleged that as many as 150 of the names and signatures were faked.
“What seems to have happened is that a variety of people in northern Indiana knew that this fraud occurred, and actively participated and perpetuated the fraud, and did so on behalf of two presidential campaigns,” said Nees.
So as far as ‘rules’ go, it doesn’t matter to the Democrat Party whether or not signatures are forged or even whether the people allegedly signing them are alive or dead. So why even have petitions at all?
Apparently so they can shut out GOP candidates.
As lax as they are about checking up on Democrat petitions, they are very closely watching the GOP when they use them.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Texas Governor Rick Perry failed to qualify for Virginia’s March 6 Republican primary.
Do you hear Gingrich and Perry complaining to the NAACP for discrimination? Nope. They accepted their disqualification like the men they are and didn’t blame the world for it. That’s a big difference between us and them.
DEMOCRAT RULE #3: It’s okay to intimidate & threaten Republican voters (NOTE: THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO DEMOCRAT VOTERS)
Another very effective way Democrats can help their voting process along is by having scary guys with clubs stand outside voting precincts threatening people as they go in. Sounds kind of wrong, doesn’t it? Well unfortunately we all learned in the 2008 elections that if you do this scary threatening thing, Eric Holder will personally get you off the hook—if you’re a Democrat…
DEMOCRAT RULE #4: No impounding illegal’s cars (NOTE: THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO LEGAL CITIZEN’S CARS…)
In California, militant Hispanic groups are trying to make it even more difficult for all us legal drivers in Los Angeles. They are saying it is “unfair” for ILLEGAL drivers to have their cars impounded if they’re found to be, well, illegal. So from now on, seems anything goes–as long as you’re not a legal citizen, of course. If you’re a legal citizen and you do something wrong, your car will definitely be impounded.
For example you’ve got two drivers—one legal, one illegal–making the same illegal u-turns on a road. Both drivers have lapsed license and registration. From what I understand, this new potential California “fairness rule” means that the illegal driver gets to keep his car, while the legal driver’s car gets impounded. For a group of folks who claim to want to ‘even the playing field’, this doesn’t seem very even to me in any way.
So my big question is: What the heck are traffic rules for anymore? Is the DOJ trying to say that our rules and laws only apply to legal US citizens and not for the folks who sneak across our borders illegally?
And if that’s the case, someone please tell me why anyone would bother coming to America using legal means? If the easiest way to get free healthcare, food and shelter is by illegal, why try to become a legal citizen?
DEMOCRAT RULE #5: Free college to illegals (NOTE: THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO MANY LEGAL STUDENTS, including my son…)
So we’ve already established the fact that you don’t need to be legal to vote, to drive or much of anything—and this year Governor Jerry Brown signed the “California Dream Act” in which he gave illegals yet another incentive never, ever to become legal. Why would they? If you’re handed everything you need to survive—including a free college education–why would you ever do it any other way?
I may sound tough and cold-hearted to some, but I’ve lived the struggling single-mom life. I’ve had to make difficult choices, like whether to pay my car payment or buy groceries. But as difficult as things were for me back then, it never occurred to me to do anything illegal to get what I needed for my family.
I resent the liberals in government who are not only encouraging people to break the law but they’re actually making it easier for them to break it than to follow it.
Whether liberals want to admit it or not, our country was set up as a Judeo/Christian nation. The rules we are supposed to follow— the foundation of our Constitution– were carefully chosen by our Founders based on Biblical principal. These rules, in a nutshell, state that there are consequences for our actions.
Unfortunately it seems the liberal agenda is becoming clearer each day—basically that they don’t believe there should be any rules in America whatsoever. They don’t want any lines dividing what’s right and wrong because who decides what’s “right” anyway—a God most of them don’t believe in? It seems they don’t believe there should be any consequences for any of our actions—unless, of course, the actions are committed by their arch-enemies, Conservatives.
So what’s the point? It seems to me if you eliminate all of our rules, the only thing left is anarchy, lawlessness, chaos, nothingness.
My husband always says “Do right and right will follow” and no matter how backwards this world becomes, I’m going to continue to do just that. I’ll live by the laws of the land, I’ll drive legally and will do my best to legally, legitimately vote the Obama administration out of America forever.
I pray that right will follow.
Trending Now on Politichicks
Sorry. No data so far.